5-Day Seminar: Evaluation To help us improve our work, thank you for filling out the form before 18 December 2017. I. Assessement of the content 1. Were the scope and the coverage of the training responsive to your needs? * Yes No 2. Was the level of information given adequate? * Yes No 3. Was the quality of training material adequate? * Yes No II. a) Assessement of the delivery: Lecturer 1 - Mr Franck Sottou 4. Lecturer's knowledge about the topic? * Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor 5. Lecturer's presentation style: * Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor 6. Interaction of lecturers with participants? * Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor 7. Time dedicated to questions & answers? * Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor 8. Examples and illustrations used by lecturers? * Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor II. b) Assessement of the delivery: Lecturer 2 - Mr Colm Dunne 9. Lecturer's knowledge about the topic? * Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor 10. Lecturer's presentation style: * Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor 11. Interaction of lecturers with participants? * Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor 12. Time dedicated to questions & answers? * Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor 13. Examples and illustrations used by lecturers? * Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor II.c) Assessement of the delivery: Lecturer 3 - Ms Susanne Volz 14. Lecturer's knowledge about the topic? * Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor 15. Lecturer's presentation style: * Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor 16. Interaction of lecturers with participants? * Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor 17. Time dedicated to questions & answers? * Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor 18. Examples and illustrations used by lecturers? * Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor III. Assessement of the event How would you rate: 19. Registration system? * Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor 20. Communication and information before the training? * Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor 21. Training room? * Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor 22. Location? * Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor 23. Food? * Excellent Good Fair Poor Very poor Any comment(s)? IV. General assessement 24. What are the strenghs of this training? * 25. What could be improved? * 26. From 1 to 10, where 10 is the best, how would you rate the event overall? * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 V. Assessement of your needs 27. Are you more interested in: * Seminars abroad In-house training E-learning 28. What issue(s) are you interested in? * General EU Funds Management E-Cohesion Communication Selection Results Simplification Closure Simplified Costs Financial Instruments Territorial Instruments Verification Fraud Risk Management Audit State Aid Public Procurement ESF Innovation R&D Global Grants Other topic(s)Other topic(s) 29. Would you recommend this training to your colleagues? * Yes No 30. How did you find out about ETCP seminars? * Your organisation/colleagues ETCP Website Email(s)' from ETCP Google search Social Networks OtherOther If you are interested by our services, please, leave your contact details: Name & Surname: E-mail: Organisation: Δ